Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Demon"

From SMT: Dx2 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
~Maaster
 
~Maaster
 +
 +
 +
 +
There, updated it. Does that work for you also?
 +
 +
~Maaster
 +
 +
 +
 +
Yup, looks good. Hopefully it wasn't too much work to get it decent, though I did check in a lot to see several variations of it, so I'm sure it took a lot of effort. Thanks for going through all the trouble just for me.

Latest revision as of 17:17, 7 August 2019

Why get rid of skill descriptions on Demon pages? Not really feeling this change. The rest of the changes you've made are good, but I'd rather skill descriptions be left on Demon pages. Sure, they're pretty cumbersome with some of the longer ones, but the point of Demon pages is to convey as much information about the Demon as possible, not hide it away in several pages you need to click if you want specific information on what a skill does.


I felt the same, but asking around in Discord I heard no complaints and everyone was for this shorter one (I left both in at once for comparison), even newer players.

I am working on a Tooltip based system to provide the description on hovering over the skill name though. Is that a good compromise?

Also...Are you active on Discord? Its easier to discuss things like this there. I tagged you once but you didnt reply (Or I missed it).

~Maaster


"I am working on a Tooltip based system to provide the description on hovering over the skill name though. Is that a good compromise?" I actually assumed that that was what you did, but was disappointed when nothing appeared. I'd be fine with that.

Also, I can get on Discord, it's just a hassle for me to do so is all.


Yeah, I might not be able to do this as easily. Might have to change the database to split Descriptions from levels. At least I added MP Costs!

If you have any other idea to do this, feel free. My way will probably take a few days.

~Maaster


There, updated it. Does that work for you also?

~Maaster


Yup, looks good. Hopefully it wasn't too much work to get it decent, though I did check in a lot to see several variations of it, so I'm sure it took a lot of effort. Thanks for going through all the trouble just for me.